July 25, 2017

India's dollar diplomacy takes off, puts China's domination under threat

http://m.economictimes.com/news/politics-and-nation/new-delhis-dollar-diplomacy-takes-off-challenges-beijing/articleshow/59729503.cms?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&utm_campaign=ETFBMain



By Dipanjan Roy Chaudhury, ET Bureau | Updated: Jul 24, 2017, 09.50 AM IST

A non-traditional area where India has extended the line of credit during the past three years is the defence sector — Vietnam, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Mauritius.

NEW DELHI: Although a late starter, India is fast catching up with China in extendingcredit world over to build infrastructure and push economic ventures.

While Delhi extended LoC worth 10 bn USD to its partners between 2003-2014 the figure has now touched 24.2 bn USD since the Modi government came to power. 52 LoCs worth 14.2 bn USD has been granted since May 2014 and more are in pipeline when King of Jordan and President of Belarus visits Delhi later this year.

While correcting malpractices that had crept into India’s African endeavours, New Delhi had completed 20 major ventures in the past two years, official sources told ET. The focus under LoC extended through MEA’s Development Partnership Administration (DPA) wing is now on key infrastructure projects and not just capacity building ventures, sources said referring to two such endeavours in Africa – Presidential office in Ghana (symbol of Indo-Ghana friendship) and National Assembly building complex in Gambia.

Such iconic symbols of bilateral partnership have been hallmark of Chinese presence across continents. “This kind of infrastructure projects have political significance and contribute to overall strengthening of bilateral partnership between two countries,” pointed out an expert who has closely followed Chinese infrastructure projects across Asia and Africa. It is a common knowledge that while China dictates type and terms & conditions of projects for which it extends grants, Indian approach is consultative in nature keeping in mind local requirements and sentiments while extending LoC throughEXIM Bank.

A non-traditional area where India has extended LoC during the past three years is defence sector. Defence related LoC have been extended to Vietnam (500 mn USD), Bangladesh (500 mn USD), Sri Lanka (100 mn USD) besides Mauritius. India has been receiving requests for supply of defence equipment from friendly countries in SE Asia, Africa and Latin America. Defence related LoC extended by India is expected to grow in the coming years, according to an expert who has followed India’s defence partnerships across regions.

During the past one year alone 13 projects aggregating 925.94 mn USD across 10 countries have been completed under LoC mechanism. “Development Partnership is a key instrument in India’s foreign policy. Extension of LoC on concessional terms is an important component of India’s development cooperation policy in Africa, Asia and Latin America. The surge in LoCs since May 2014 reflects political commitment towards development partnership. LoCs are governed by IDEAS (Indian Development & Economic Assistance Scheme) guidelines which were revised by the Modi government in 2015 and these guidelines will remain applicable till 2019-20. The new guidelines have been able to check malpractices and nepotism in extension and implementation of LoC supported projects particularly in Africa,” pointed out one of the sources quoted above.

New IDEAS guidlines classify LoC recipient countries as per levels of their development and also specify rate of interest of concessional loans depending on income level of countries besides outling oversight mechanism and operational guidelines of LoC. Unlike India Chinese loans are offered at commericial rates and this has pushed certain countries in Asia and Africa into debt trap.

In the past most LoC contracts in Africa and other developing countries were won by 5-6 companies which had established good networks, alleged one the persons familiar with the issue. ET has learnt that these companies would undertake a wide range of projects through sub-contracting, even though they did not have much experience in executing projects in India. The Feasibility Reports for projects were often lacking in detail and clarity, leading to escalation of costs and leaving scope for ambiguity. Besides lack of scrutiny of tender documents and evaluation led to misuse of LoC, alleged the person quoted above.

The oversight mechanism put in place to check misuse of LoC funds include accompaniment of project proposal with Detailed Project Report (DPR) by companies willing to undertake projects, Pre-Qualification (PQ) exercise to identify experienced and competent companies for implementing LoC projects, closer scrutiny over vetting of DPRs, tender documents and bid evaluation by the lending bank, informed persons familiar with the process.

India’s EXIM Bank to ensure effective LoC implementation has undertaken empanelment of Consulting firms and EPC contractors. EXIM Bank has completed empanelment of 82 consulting firms in various sectors. A total of 117 firms have been empanelled as EPC Contractors.

Yet certain challenges remain in implementing LoC in some countries due to geographical constraints, according to domain experts. Some of India funded projects are in the most remote regions in the world where availability of material and skilled manpower are scarce. Besides such areas are also impacted by lack of electricity, water resources and proper connectivity

July 24, 2017

25 years of Indo-Isreal friendship , Event

Indian Superman who taught Chinese a lesson in 1962

ISIS’s Global Campaign Remains Intact

https://isnblog.ethz.ch/uncategorized/isiss-global-campaign-remains-intact
prev


24/07/2017 Jennifer Cafarella Uncategorized

Image courtesy of Surian Soosay/Flickr. (CC BY 2.0)

This article was originally published by the Institute for the Study War on 12 July 2017.

ISIS’s first attack in Iran punctuated two stark realities: the group’s annual Ramadan campaign is alive while the US-led anti-ISIS campaign is on a path to failure. ISIS surges attacks every year during Ramadan in order to gain or increase momentum in its global campaign to maintain its declared caliphate, expand across the Muslim world, and win an apocalyptic war with the West. ISIS has conducted successful attacks in three new countries this year – the United Kingdom, the Philippines, and Iran – and will likely pull off more before the Muslim holy month is over. The jihadist group has sustained a global insurgency despite the considerable military pressure it faces in Iraq and Syria.

ISIS has been waging its global campaign in four separate “rings” since 2014. First, ISIS is defending and attempting to remain in and expand its territorial control in its “core terrain” in Syria and Iraq. Second, ISIS seeks to weaken the Middle East’s power centers of Turkey, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, and Iran. Third, ISIS is expanding in other Muslim majority countries through attack networks and, when possible, ground operations. Fourth, ISIS is conducting spectacular attacks in the non-Muslim majority world, or the “far abroad,” in order to polarize those communities and radicalize their minority Muslim populations. ISIS’s Ramadan surges set conditions in these rings, varying its main effort based on its circumstances and the capabilities in Iraq and Syria and of its networks abroad.

ISIS’s first Ramadan surges in 2012, 2013 and 2014 kick started its resurgent campaigns to seize vast swaths of terrain in Iraq and Syria and declare the caliphate. ISIS continues to strike offensively against anti-ISIS forces in Iraq and Syria each Ramadan. ISIS began its campaigns in the “far abroad” and Muslim world as early as late 2013, when the ISIS external operations wing in Syria began to recruit, train, and deploy foreign fighters to conduct spectacular attacks in Europe and across the Middle East and North Africa. In 2014, ISIS sent senior operatives to Libya and Sinai in order to cultivate new affiliates. ISIS’s success in the Muslim world in 2014 enabled it to recognize formal affiliates in Afghanistan and PakistanSaudi Arabia, AlgeriaRussia’s Caucasus, Nigeria, and Yemen before Ramadan 2015. ISIS did so in order to “remain” in Iraq and Syria and “expand” by creating resilience globally to counter pressure.

The main effort of ISIS’s Ramadan campaigns became the Muslim world and “far abroad” in 2015, after reaching its apex in Iraq and Syria by seizing the cities of Ramadi and Palmyra shortly beforehand. ISIS surged its campaign in the Muslim world, including spectacular attacks at a beach resort in Tunisia and a Shi’a mosque in Kuwait while continuing to deploy attack cells into Europe. ISIS struck a wide variety of targets across the Muslim world and the “far abroad” in 2016, including successful attacks in BangladeshTurkey, and Saudi Arabia. The same year a terrorist pledging allegiance to ISIS’s leader attacked a nightclub in Orlando, Florida, shortly after the beginning of Ramadan.

ISIS is expanding its reach even further this Ramadan, which began on May 26. ISIS conducted two near-simultaneous, complex, coordinated attacks against symbolic targets in Iran’s capital on June 7. These attacks are a major inflection point that signals growing capability in the second ring of strong Muslim states. ISIS is also gaining momentum in Southeast Asia, part of its third ring, where it launched a major ground offensive in the Philippines, seizing a city and defending it against a counter-offensive by Philippine security forces. ISIS also conducted its first successful suicide attack in the UK, a priority target in the majority non-Muslim fourth ring. This attack suggests ISIS has a growing network in Europe despite increasing European counterterrorism efforts. Other ISIS attack cells have been thwarted in areas with ISIS networks including Spain, Tunisia, and Russia. ISIS has continued to conduct a Ramadan surge in Iraq, though security forces have thwarted some of its attacks.

The scope of ISIS’s current global Ramadan campaign, its continuity with past campaigns, and its resilience within Iraq and Syria demonstrates that the US has failed to contain ISIS or to reclaim the initiative, much less destroy the organization. Secretary of Defense James Mattis has said America’s goals against ISIS are to “crush ISIS’s claims of invincibility, deny ISIS a geographic haven from which to hatch murder, eliminate ISIS ability to operate externally, and eradicate their ability to recruit and finance terrorist operations.” Current US-led operations in Syria and Iraq will not accomplish these objectives. These operations amount to chasing the ISIS external attack cell around the battlefield through successive linear, tactical assaults that tie up our military capability without achieving decisive results. The ISIS external attack cell has now moved from Raqqa, the main effort of U.S.-backed operations, to southeastern Syria near the Iraqi border, an area where America’s ground partners cannot now project force.

ISIS is globalizing its external attack capability in order to endure even a total loss of its terrain in Iraq and Syria, which even today extends beyond Mosul and Raqqa, respectively. ISIS is deliberately “[fostering] interconnectedness among its scattered branches, networks, and supporters, seeking to build a global organization,” according to an assessment released by the anti-ISIS coalition in March 2017. The US has increased the tempo of operations against high-value ISIS operatives, but has not disabled the external operations cell. ISIS has shifted to mobilizing prospective fighters in place rather than bringing them to Syria, Iraq, or Libya as foreign fighters. ISIS’s expansion in farther flung areas like Afghanistan and Southeast Asia also generates alternative basing options for command-and-control elements and potential fighting forces.

President Donald Trump’s supposed “acceleration” of the anti-ISIS campaign he inherited from his predecessor has minimally increased the speed of tactical gains in Raqqa and Mosul while doing little to ensure that the U.S. achieves its strategic objectives The liberation of Mosul and Raqqa in 2014 might have defeated the organization, but it no longer suffices. ISIS’s global attack network is now more robust, dispersed, and resilient than ever. ISIS will remain dedicated to its global objectives after Mosul and Raqqa fall and will continue to wage a calculated global campaign. ISIS’s global success generates a momentum for jihadism that will endure even if the US manages to defeat the organization, moreover. Al Qaeda is waiting to pick up the mantle of the global war against the West, and could be even more successful than ISIS. The threat the US faces from jihadism vastly overmatches its current hyper-tactical campaign in Iraq and Syria. The first step in placing the US and its allies back on a path to victory is to recognize that the existing strategy of tactics will not suffice.

About the Authors

Jennifer Cafarella is the Lead Intelligence Planner at the Institute for the Study of War.

Melissa Pavlik is a Counter-terrorism Analyst at the Institute for the Study of War